OK.. so now that i've got your attention, lol
...NO this isn't porn... she's just comfortable with her own sexuality... and.. uh.. expressing... it.... actually, a friend wanted me to get into "furries", so this is just a test run. I'm thinking of doing a couple more just for fun.
If you like it, comment... and if you don't, then... write hate mail... i guess...
I'm hoping to start posting on a regular basis!
Wish me luck! lol.
15 comments:
for someone who may actually know the "model" I think it looks great. the waist may be a bit too narrow but you got the legs right. keep up the good work. and dont let saybier influence you too much. Silk
Nice facial expression! It works.
Hahaha, weird. Well done.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom
ahem.
don't you know beastiality is gross?
It's not bestiality if it's a fox or a hippo playing with himself. Now if Michael Jackson poked a sheep, that would be bestiality (even if it's no great surprise, coming from him).
Don't let anybody push you into drawing furries, Greggers. Draw all the naked human ladies you want.
Sexualizing animals is.... well, um....sick dude.
You know that right? I'm not judging, I'm just saying...
Sexualizing animals is.... well, um....sick dude.
I didn't imply otherwise. All I did was to point out to Skid that the term bestiality denotes sexual relations between humans and animals, not (as she seemed to think) sex among animals or animal-like humans.
I'm not judging, I'm just saying...
Same here.
I was actually talking to Greg..
Whoops. :*
Hey man,
Its an interesting style, and well done. And yes, it is saybier's fault, but we won't hold it against her.
Let me know if you come up with anything else,
My my my, lol
It certainly seems like i've at least given you guys something to talk about, haha. I'm afraid I happen to agree with Mike and Vaalic, Sid has her definition a little confused, and of course the sexuality was my choice... but hey, at least it isn't boring ;-p
post some more then!
I wish to be visually violated.
Post a Comment