Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Meow Meow


OK.. so now that i've got your attention, lol

...NO this isn't porn... she's just comfortable with her own sexuality... and.. uh.. expressing... it.... actually, a friend wanted me to get into "furries", so this is just a test run. I'm thinking of doing a couple more just for fun.

If you like it, comment... and if you don't, then... write hate mail... i guess...

I'm hoping to start posting on a regular basis!
Wish me luck! lol.

19 comments:

Saybier said...

lol not my fault! But she is great!

Anonymous said...

for someone who may actually know the "model" I think it looks great. the waist may be a bit too narrow but you got the legs right. keep up the good work. and dont let saybier influence you too much. Silk

party for my enemies said...

don't you know beastiality is gross?

Joanna said...

Nice facial expression! It works.

Fraz said...

Hahaha, weird. Well done.

SAL said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom

ahem.

Michael Gushulak said...

don't you know beastiality is gross?

It's not bestiality if it's a fox or a hippo playing with himself. Now if Michael Jackson poked a sheep, that would be bestiality (even if it's no great surprise, coming from him).

Don't let anybody push you into drawing furries, Greggers. Draw all the naked human ladies you want.

SAL said...

Sexualizing animals is.... well, um....sick dude.

You know that right? I'm not judging, I'm just saying...

Michael Gushulak said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Michael Gushulak said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Michael Gushulak said...

Sexualizing animals is.... well, um....sick dude.

I didn't imply otherwise. All I did was to point out to Skid that the term bestiality denotes sexual relations between humans and animals, not (as she seemed to think) sex among animals or animal-like humans.

I'm not judging, I'm just saying...

Same here.

SAL said...

I was actually talking to Greg..

Michael Gushulak said...

Whoops. :*

Vaalic said...

Hey man,
Its an interesting style, and well done. And yes, it is saybier's fault, but we won't hold it against her.

Let me know if you come up with anything else,

Saybier said...

The playing with herself is not my fault. I only introduced him to furries. The sexuality is his own ;) I am curious as to why sexualising animals is gross considering she has a basic human shape. (Oh, and the first cartoons were not for children and they are considered furries too)

Vaalic said...

It's just a style. There's nothing really gross about it. Its not pornographic or anything. Just more... expressive. Besides, its a neat looking style, and you could do just about anything with it. Now all you need is cat ninjas or something.

And though the more provocative pose is Greg guy's, you have to admit that all the examples you showed him were... well, more "expressive". haha

Greggers said...

My my my, lol
It certainly seems like i've at least given you guys something to talk about, haha. I'm afraid I happen to agree with Mike and Vaalic, Sid has her definition a little confused, and of course the sexuality was my choice... but hey, at least it isn't boring ;-p

SAL said...

post some more then!

SAL said...

I wish to be visually violated.